Esophageal
cancer histopathological reporting
Protocol applies to all
carcinomas of the esophagus.
Procedures
·
Cytology
A.
Clinical Information
1.
Patient identification
a.
Name
b.
Identification number
c.
Age (birth date)
d.
Gender
2.
Responsible physician(s)
3.
Date of procedure
4.
Other clinical information
a.
Relevant history (e.g. previous diagnoses; previous radiotherapy or
chemotherapy)
b.
Relevant findings (e.g. endoscopic/imaging studies)
c.
Clinical diagnosis
d.
Procedure (e.g. brushing, washing, other)
e.
Anatomic site(s) of specimen(s)
B.
Macroscopic Examination
1.
Specimen
a.
Unfixed/fixed (specify fixative)
b.
Number of slides received (if appropriate)
c.
Quantity and appearance of fluid specimen (if appropriate)
d.
Other (e.g. cytologic preparation from tissue)
e.
Results of intraprocedural consultation
2.
Material submitted for microscopic evaluation
3.
Special studies (specify) (e.g. cytochemistry, immunocytochemistry, DNA analysis
[specify type], morphometry, cytogenetic)
C.
Microscopic Evaluation
1.
Adequacy of specimen (if unsatisfactory for evaluation, specify reason)
2.
Tumor, if present
a.
Histologic type, if possible (Note A)
b.
Histologic grade, if possible (Note B)
c.
Other features (e.g. necrosis)
3.
Additional pathologic findings, if present
4.
Results/status of special studies (specify)
5.
Comments
a.
Correlation with intraprocedural consultation, as appropriate
b.
Correlation with other specimens, as appropriate
c.
Correlation with clinical information, as appropriate
II.
Incisional or excisional biopsy
A.
Clinical Information
1.
Patient identification
a.
Name
b.
Identification number
c.
Age (birth date)
d.
Gender
2.
Responsible physician(s)
3.
Date of procedure
4.
Other clinical information
a.
Relevant findings (e.g. endoscopic/imaging studies)
b.
Clinical diagnosis
c.
Procedure (e.g. endoscopic biopsy/polypectomy)
d.
Operative findings
e.
Anatomic site(s) of specimen(s)
B.
Macroscopic Examination
1.
Specimen
a.
Unfixed/fixed (specify fixative)
b.
Number of pieces
c.
Largest dimension of each piece
d.
Results of intraoperative consultation
2.
Tumor (if discernible)
a.
Location
b.
Descriptive features
c.
Dimensions
d.
Configuration
e.
Relation to margins (excisional biopsy)
3.
Tissue submitted for microscopic evaluation
a.
Incisional biopsy: all
b.
Excisional biopsy: lesion; margin(s) of excision (if identified)
c.
Frozen section tissue fragment(s)(unless saved for special studies)
4.
Special studies (specify) (e.g. histochemistry, immunohistochemistry, DNA
analysis [specify type], morphometry, cytogenetic analysis)
C.
Microscopic Evaluation
1.
Tumor
a.
Histologic type (Note A)
b.
Histologic grade (Note B)
c.
Extent of invasion (as appropriate)
d.
Blood/lymphatic vessel invasion
2.
Additional pathologic findings, if present
a.
Esophagitis
b.
Barrett's esophagus
c.
Squamous dysplasia
d.
Glandular dysplasia
e.
Microorganisms
f.
Other(s)
3.
Status/results of special studies (specify)
4.
Comments
a.
Correlation with intraoperative consultation, as appropriate
b.
Correlation with other specimens, as appropriate
c.
Correlation with clinical information, as appropriate
A.
Clinical Information
1.
Patient identification
a.
Name
b.
Identification number
c.
Age (birth date)
d.
Gender
2.
Responsible physician(s)
3.
Date of procedure
4.
Other clinical information
a.
Relevant history (e.g. previous diagnoses; previous radiotherapy or
chemotherapy)
b.
Relevant findings (e.g. endoscopic and/or imaging studies)
c.
Clinical diagnosis
d.
Procedure
e.
Operative findings
f.
Anatomic site(s) of specimen(s)
B.
Macroscopic Examination
1.
Specimen
a.
Organ(s)/tissue(s) included
b.
Unfixed/fixed (specify fixative)
c.
Open/unopened
d.
Dimensions (measure each piece separately)
e.
Orientation (if indicated by surgeon)
f.
Results of intraoperative consultation
2.
Tumor
a.
Location (Note C)
b.
Configuration (Note D)
c.
Dimensions (three)
d.
Descriptive features (e.g. color/consistency)
e.
Ulceration/perforation
f.
Distance from margins (Note F)
(1)
proximal
(2)
distal
(3)
radial (soft tissue margin closest to deepest tumor penetration)
g.
Estimated depth of invasion
h.
Extension to other organ(s)/structure(s) (specify)
3.
Lesions in noncancerous esophagus
a.
Barrett's esophagus
b.
Ulcer
c.
Other(s)
4.
Regional lymph nodes (Note E)
a.
Number
b.
Location (if possible)
5.
Other organs/tissues submitted (e.g., non-regional lymph nodes)
6.
Tissues submitted for microscopic evaluation
a.
Carcinoma, including
(1)
point of deepest penetration
(2)
interface with adjacent proximal and distal esophagus
b.
Margins (Note F)
(1)
proximal
(2)
distal
(3)
radial (soft tissue margin closest to deepest tumor penetration)
c.
All lymph nodes (Note E)
d.
Other lesions (e.g. ulcers/polyps/Barrett's esophagus)
e.
Esophagus uninvolved by tumor
f.
Frozen section tissue fragment(s) (unless saved for special studies)
g.
Other organ(s)/tissue(s)
7.
Special studies (specify) (e.g. histochemistry, immunohistochemistry, DNA
analysis [specify type], morphometry, cytogenetic analysis)
C.
Microscopic Examination
1.
Tumor
a.
Histologic type (Note A)
b.
Histologic grade (Note B)
c.
Depth of invasion (pT) (Note G)
d.
Invasion into stomach
e.
Blood/lymphatic vessel invasion
2.
Margins (Note F):
a.
Proximal
b.
Distal
c.
Radial (soft tissue margin closest to deepest tumor penetration)
d.
Additional pathologic findings, if present
(1)
Squamous dysplasia
(2)
Barrett's esophagus
(3)
Glandular dysplasia
(4)
Therapy-related atypia
(5)
Other(s)
3.
Regional lymph nodes (Note G)
a.
Number (location if possible)
b.
Number with metastatic tumor
4.
Distant metastasis (specify sites) (Note G)
5.
Other organs/tissues submitted
6.
Results/status of special studies (specify)
7.
Comments
a.
Correlation with intraoperative consultation, as appropriate
b.
Correlation with other specimens, as appropriate
c.
Correlation with clinical information, as appropriate
EXPLANATORY
NOTES
For consistency in
reporting, the histologic classification proposed by the World Health
Organization (WHO) is recommended.(1) However, this protocol does not preclude
the use of other systems of classification or histologic types.
WHO Classification of
Carcinoma of the Esophagus
Spindle
cell (squamous) carcinoma
Adenocarcinoma
Adenosquamous
carcinoma
Mucoepidermoid
carcinoma*
Adenoid
cystic carcinoma*
Small
cell carcinoma
Undifferentiated
carcinoma
Others
* These types are not
generally graded.
The term carcinoma, NOS
(not otherwise specified) is not part of the WHO classification.
The histologic grades for
esophageal squamous cell carcinomas are:
|
Grade X |
Grade cannot be
assessed |
|
Grade 1 |
Well differentiated |
|
Grade 2 |
Moderately
differentiated |
|
Grade 3 |
Poorly differentiated
|
|
[Grade 4 |
Undifferentiated*] |
*Undifferentiated tumors
cannot be categorized as squamous (or other) type and are classified as
"undifferentiated carcinomas" in the WHO classification of tumor types
(see above) which are, by definition, Grade 4.
If there are variations in
the differentiation within the tumor, the highest (least favorable) grade is
recorded. In general, mucoepidermoid carcinoma and adenoid cystic carcinoma of
the esophagus are not amenable to grading. By convention, small cell carcinoma
is assigned Grade 4.
For adenocarcinomas, a
suggested grading system based on the proportion of the tumor that is composed
of glands is as follows:
|
Grade X |
Grade cannot be
assessed |
|
Grade 1 |
Well differentiated
(>95% of tumor composed of glands) |
|
Grade 2 |
Moderately
differentiated (50-95% of tumor composed of glands) |
|
Grade 3 |
Poorly differentiated
(5-49% of tumor composed of glands) |
|
Grade 4 |
Undifferentiated
(<5% of tumor composed of glands) |
Undifferentiated tumors
cannot be categorized as adenocarcinoma (or other) type and are classified as
"undifferentiated carcinomas" in the WHO classification of tumor types
(see above) which are, by definition, Grade 4.
The location of the tumor
with respect to the gastroesophageal junction (defined as where the tubular
esophagus meets the stomach) should be noted. For tumors involving the
gastroesophageal junction (GEJ), specific observations should be recorded in an
attempt to establish the exact site of origin of the tumor. GEJ is defined as
the junction of the tubular esophagus and the stomach irrespective of the type
of epithelial lining of the esophagus. The pathologist should record the:
·
proportion of tumor mass located
in the esophagus and stomach
·
greatest dimensions of esophageal
and gastric portions of the tumor
·
anatomic location of the center of
the tumor (cervical, upper thoracic, midthoracic, lower thoracic)
Configuration includes
exophytic (fungating), endophytic (ulcerative), and diffusely infiltrative, but
overlap among these types is common. Reporting of complex configurations may
require more than one descriptor.
Regional lymph nodes
comprise the cervical nodes (including the supraclavicular nodes) for the
cervical esophagus and the mediastinal nodes for the intrathoracic esophagus.
Margins include the
proximal, distal, and radial margins. The radial margin represents the
adventitial soft tissue margin closest to the deepest penetration of tumor.
Sections to evaluate the proximal and distal resections margins can be obtained
in two orientations: (1) en face sections parallel to the margin or (2)
longitudinal sections perpendicular to the margin. Depending on the closeness of
the tumor to the margin, select the orientation(s) that will most clearly
demonstrate the status of the margin. The distance from the tumor edge to the
closest resection margin(s) should be measured. Proximal and distal resection
margins should be evaluated for dysplasia and/or Barrett's metaplasia. It may be
helpful to mark the margin(s) closest to the tumor with ink. Margins marked by
ink should be designated in the macroscopic description.
The TNM Staging System for
esophageal carcinoma of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) and the
International Union Against Cancer (UICC) is recommended and shown below.(2-4)
Category T1 has been expanded according to recommendations published in the TNM
Supplement.
By AJCC/UICC convention,
the designation "T" refers to a primary tumor that has not been
previously treated. The symbol "p" refers to the pathologic
classification of the TNM, as opposed to the clinical classification and is
based on gross and microscopic examination. pT entails a resection of the
primary tumor or biopsy adequate to evaluate the highest pT category; pN entails
removal of nodes adequate to validate lymph node metastasis; and pM implies
microscopic examination of distant lesions. Clinical classification (cTNM) is
usually carried out by the referring physician before treatment during initial
evaluation of the patient or when pathologic classification is not possible.
Residual
Tumor in the Patient
Tumor remaining in a
patient after therapy with curative intent (e.g., surgical resection for cure)
is categorized by a system known as R classification, shown below.
RX
Presence of residual tumor cannot be assessed
R0
No residual tumor
R1
Microscopic residual tumor
R2
Macroscopic residual tumor
For the surgeon, the R
classification may be useful to indicate the known or assumed status of the
completeness of a surgical excision. For the pathologist, the R classification
is relevant to the status of the margins of a surgical resection specimen. That
is, tumor involving the resection margin on pathologic examination may be
assumed to correspond to residual tumor in the patient and may be classified as
macroscopic or microscopic according to the findings at the specimen margin(s).
Residual
Tumor in a Specimen
In contrast, tumor
remaining in a resection specimen from a patient who has undergone previous (neoadjuvant)
treatment of any type (radiation therapy alone, chemotherapy therapy alone, or
any combined modality treatment) is codified by the TNM using a prescript
"y" (e.g., ypT1). Thus, yTNM indicates the post-treatment status of
the tumor. For many neoadjuvant therapies, the classification of residual
disease may be a strong predictor of postoperative outcome. In addition, the
ypTNM classification provides a standardized framework for the collection of
data needed to accurately evaluate new neoadjuvant therapies.
Locally
Recurrent Tumor
In contrast to
"residual" tumor, classification of a tumor as "recurrent"
requires a documented disease-free interval after definitive therapy. Recurrent
tumor may also be classified according to the TNM categories, but the prefix
"r" (e.g., rpT1) is used to indicate the recurrent status of the
tumor.
Primary
Tumor (T)
TX
Primary tumor cannot be assessed
T0
No evidence of primary tumor
Tis
Carcinoma in situ (including high-grade dysplasia)
T1
Tumor invades lamina propria or submucosa
T1a
Tumor invades lamina propria*
T1b
Tumor invades submucosa*
T2
Tumor invades muscularis propria
T3
Tumor invades adventitia
T4
Tumor invades adjacent structures
*Separation into T1a and
T1b is justified by differences in frequency of lymph node metastasis and
subsequent prognosis.(4-7) T1a and T1b correlate with lymph node metastasis and
prognosis as follows.
|
|
Lymph
node |
5-year |
|
T1a |
0% |
100% |
|
T1B |
47% |
86% without nodal
metastasis |
|
|
|
43% with nodal
metastasis |
Regional
Lymph Nodes (N) †
NX
Regional lymph nodes cannot be assessed
N0
No regional lymph node metastasis
N1
Regional lymph node metastasis
N1a
1-3 nodes involved*
N1b
4-7 nodes involved*
N1c
>7 nodes involved*
A mediastinal
lymphadenectomy specimen will ordinarily include 6 or more regional lymph nodes.
Separation into N1a, N1b,
and N1c is justified by differences in prognosis as follows.
|
|
2-year |
5-year |
Median |
|
N1a |
22% |
11% |
12 |
|
N1b |
18% |
0% |
9 |
|
N1c |
0% |
0% |
6 |
Distant
Metastasis (M)
MX
Distant metastasis cannot be assessed
M0
No distant metastasis
M1
Distant metastasis*
*For tumors of the lower
thoracic esophagus:
M1a
Metastasis in celiac lymph nodes
M1b
Other distant metastasis
*For tumors of the upper
thoracic esophagus:
M1a
Metastasis in cervical nodes
M1b
Other distant metastasis
*For tumors of the
mid-thoracic esophagus:
M1a
Not applicable
M1b
Non-regional lymph nodes or other distant metastasis
Tumors of the midthoracic
esophagus are staged only M1b, since tumors with metastasis in non-regional
lymph nodes as well as in other sites have an equally poor prognosis.
Stage
Groupings
|
Stage 0 |
Tis |
N0 |
M0 |
|
Stage I |
T1 |
N0 |
M0 |
|
Stage IIA |
T2 |
N0 |
M0 |
|
|
T3 |
N0 |
M0 |
|
Stage IIB |
T1 |
N1 |
M0 |
|
|
T2 |
N1 |
M0 |
|
Stage III |
T3 |
N1 |
M0 |
|
|
T4 |
Any N |
M0 |
|
Stage IV |
Any T |
Any N |
M1 |
|
Stage IVA |
Any T |
Any N |
M1a |
|
Stage IVB |
Any T |
Any N |
M1b |